Multi-location geo-grids: one grid per site, one protocol across sites.

Why each site needs its own grid

Local rankings are location-dependent, so a portfolio's visibility is N separate rank surfaces, not one. Each location faces different competitors and different distances to demand; any brand-level average hides the sites that are failing. One grid per location, each sized to its own market, is the only design that measures the portfolio honestly.

The shared protocol

Comparability across sites comes from protocol, not from identical geometry:

1. Grids may differ per market — dense and small in urban cores, wider in suburbs — but each must stay fixed over time.
2. Keywords are shared — one service-keyword set across all sites.
3. Cadence is common — every site scanned on the same schedule, per the pipeline.

What head office reads

The monthly cross-site comparison: every location's coverage, ranked, with effort — review acquisition, profile work — triaged to the weakest sites. The reading skill is the same as for single-site maps, applied comparatively; it is covered in geo-grid rank tracking.

Portfolio economics

Tooling cost scales with location count, which puts entry pricing at the centre of the decision. LocalRank's plans start at $29 per month per localrank.so, and per-location scheduling keeps operator time flat as the portfolio grows. The landscape of alternatives is recorded on the comparison page; the sub-category definition is at local rank tracking software.

Return to the site home for the network frame.

FAQ